| |
Oil Painting -> Frans Hals Painting
|
Frans Hals
Frans Hals (1582/83 – August 26, 1666) was
a Dutch painter during the Dutch Golden Age. As a portrait painter,
by some considered as second only to Rembrandt, in Holland, he displayed
extraordinary talent and quickness in his art.
Life
Details of Frans Hals’ life are fairly well
known. He was born in 1582 or 1583 in Antwerp. His father was most
likely Catholic. Around 1585 the family emigrated to Haarlem, as
did many people from Flanders in that period.
|
It wasn't until he
was 27 that Hals became a member of the Sint-Lucasgilde (St. Lucas
Guild), but he must have been fully qualified much earlier. Various
sources mention Karel van Mander as his master. In Haarlem Hals
was married twice, and had a total of fourteen children. He live
and worked in this flourishing city on the Spaarne (river) for his
whole life, receiving commissions for countless portraits. The painter
died when he was about 84, in 1666. He was interred in the old Bavo
Church, under the choir, on the Grote Markt.
Work
Many of Hals’ works have disappeared, but
it is not known how many. According to the most authoritative present-day
catalogue, compiled by Seymour Slive in 1970-1974 (Slive’s
last great Hals exhibition catalogue followed in 1989), another
222 paintings can be ascribed to Hals. Another authority on Hals,
Claus Grimm, believes this number to be lower (145) in his ‘Frans
Hals. Das Gesamtwerk’ (1989). It is not known whether Hals
ever made landscapes, still lifes or narrative pieces, but it is
unlikely. Many artists in the 17th century in Holland opted to specialise,
and Hals also appears to have been a pure specialist. He made portraits:
individual portraits, portraits of married couples, (two pendants
that are meant to hang next to each other) and group portraits (five
rifle association pieces, now in Haarlem; portraits of regents and
regentesses: three in total, also in Haarlem). In general, these
portraits were commissioned by people in the middle and highest
ranks of society at that time: authors, mayors, clergymen, traders
and merchants and governors. The riflemen, at least the officers
and the non-commissioned officers who ordered their group portraits
usually also came from the slightly "higher" or more affluent
circles. Hals also sometimes did genre painting: fishermen's children
on the beach, a greengrocer woman, the ‘village idiot’
of Haarlem, Malle Babbe, and more of such pieces which, in a certain
sense, can also be considered portraits, but which were most likely
intended as ‘impressions of daily life’.
Painting technique
People often think that Hals ´threw´
his works on ‘aus einem Guss’ (in one toss) onto the
canvas. Further research of a technical and a scientific nature
has since clarified that this impression is not correct. True, the
odd work was largely put down ‘alla prima’, i.e. without
underdrawings or underpainting, but most of the works were created
in various layers, as was customary at that time. Sometimes a drawing
was made (with chalk or paint) on top of a coloured undercoat (grey,
pink), and was then more or less filled in, in stages. It does seem
that Hals generally applied his underpainting very loosely: he was
a virtuoso from the beginning. And this applies, of course, particularly
to his somewhat later, mature works. Hals displayed tremendous daring,
great courage and virtuosity, and had a great capacity to pull back
his hands from the canvas (or panel) as soon as the portrayed person
was on it, alive and well. He didn't "paint them to death",
as many of his contemporaries unfortunately did, in their great
accuracy and diligence (whether requested by their clients or not).
‘Een onghemeyne [ongewone] manier van schilderen, die hem
eyghen is, by nae alle [iedereen] over-treft’, (‘An
unusual manner of painting, all his own, surpassing almost everyone,’)
wrote his first biographer, Schrevelius, in the 17th century on
Hals’ painting methods. For that matter, schematic painting
was not Hals’ own idea (this approach already existed in 16th
century Italy), and Hals was probably inspired by Flemish contemporaries
(Rubens, Van Dyck) in his painting method.
Vitality
As early as the 17th century, people were struck
by the vitality of Frans Hals’ portraits. For example, Haarlem
resident Theodorus Schrevelius noted that Hals’ works reflected
‘such power and life’ that the painter ‘seems
to challenge nature with his brush’. And centuries later Vincent
van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo: ‘What a joy it is to see
a Frans Hals, how different it is from the paintings – so
many of them – where everything is carefully smoothed out
in the same manner.’ Van Gogh’s observation hits the
nail on the head: Frans Hals chose not to give a smooth finish to
his painting, as most of his contemporaries did, but tried to keep
it ‘alive’. Since life can be recognized by movement,
he made sure that the person viewing his work would have the impression
that the person on the portrait is in motion. When you see someone
in motion, you do not see that person totally in focus: you cannot
completely grasp who or what is moving; you see smears, lines, spots,
lines, spots, large patches of colour and hardly any details. This
is what we see in Hals’ portraits - especially the later ones,
when he was in top form. This approach enabled Hals to come up with
a solution for an age-old problem in art history: how do you make
a true-to-life portrait on a flat surface? With smooth painting,
of course, but then as extreme as possible (Gerard Dou and the Leiden
school). Another solution is the trompe l’oeil painting technique.
But Hals’ choice does have something very special. He was
far ahead of his time with this approach: it wasn't until the 19th
century that he had true followers, particularly among the Impressionists.
They came to the Frans Hals Museum (at that time still established
in the Town Hall on the Grote Markt) and other museums in Haarlem
in order to study spectacular pieces such as ‘The Regentesses
of the Old Men's Alms House´ and the civic guard paintings.
And to be inspired by them.
Students
It is often all too easily suggested that many
painters are considered students of Hals. But further study has
since shown that there are quite a few questions in that area. In
his ‘De Groote Schouburgh’ (1718-21), Arnold Houbraken
mentions Adriaen Brouwer, Adriaen van Ostade and Dirck van Delen
as students. Frans’ brother Dirck and his own sons were also
probably studying under him, and/or worked with him in his studio.
Then we also have Vincent Laurensz van der Vinne (according to his
son, he was a Hals student) and Pieter Gerritsz van Roestraten (according
to a notarised document; he also became a son-in-law of Hals). The
Haarlem portrait painter Johannes Verspronck (one of the ten or
so competing portraitists in Haarlem at the time) also possibly
studied for some time with Hals. In terms of style, the closest
to Hals’ work is the handful of paintings that are ascribed
to Judith Leyster (which she also often signed). So she also ‘qualifies’
as a possible student, just like her husband, the painter Jan Miense
Molenaer. There were probably more, but many painters at that time
fell into oblivion. Two centuries after his death, Hals received
a number of ‘posthumous students’. Claude Monet, Charles
Daubigny, Max Liebermann, James Whistler, Gustave Courbet, and in
the Netherlands, Jacobus van Looy and Isaac Israëls are some
of the Impressionists and realists who have delved deeply into the
work of Hals - by making study copies of his work and further building
on him. Many of them travelled to the Frans Hals Museum in Haarlem
(since 1913 on the Groot Heiligland, and before that in the Town
Hall), where several of his most important works were (and are)
kept. Hals’ works have also found their way to countless other
cities all over the world and in museum collections. From the late
19th century, they were collected everywhere: from Antwerp to Toronto,
and from London to New York. Almost every important art museum with
a large old art collection has a Hals. Hals has become one of the
classics of Dutch painting history.
Literature
The two most important publications about Hals
were written by the American art historian Seymour Slive: Frans
Hals, 3 dln (oeuvre catalogue), New York / London 1970-1974; Frans
Hals (exhibition catalogue Washington/London/Haarlem, 1989. Claus
Grimm published his ‘Frans Hals. Das Gesamtwerk’ in
1989 (Stuttgart/Zürich; also translated into Dutch). Published
in the Dutch language in 1988: N. Middelkoop and A. van Grevenstein,
Frans Hals. ‘Leven, werk, restauratie’ (Life, work and
restorations) (Haarlem Amsterdam 1988). This work gives an account
of restorations of the riflemen’s pieces, but it also gives
a picture of Hals’ life and work. A new book about Hals was
recently published: ‘Frans Hals in het Frans Hals Museum’,
by Antoon Erftemeijer; Amsterdam/Gent 2004 (in Dutch, English and
French), in which various chapters are devoted to Hals’ life,
his predecessors, portrait painting in the Golden Age, Hals’
painting technique and other subjects. Many pictures with close-ups
in this book show Hals’ works in great detail. Christopher
Atkins recently wrote an article in English on Hals’ virtuoso
painting style (‘Frans Hals’s Virtuoso Brushwork’,
Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek 2003, Zwolle 2004, p. 281-309).
The paintings are the excellent portrayal of the events and scenes
that we see around us. The painters are the best cameras of the
world. They reproduce many different types of pictures. They even
draw imaginary pictures that do not exist in this world. We tend
to use both thinned oil paints and dense oil paints. Masterpieces
can be dyed more than once, but each time it may be different from
the existing paintings.h
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|