|
Walter Sickert
Walter Richard Sickert (May 31, 1860 in Munich
(Germany) – January 22, 1942) was an English impressionist
painter.
His father Oswald was Danish-German and his mother
Eleanor was Anglo-Irish; Sickert was a cosmopolitan who favored
ordinary people and scenes as his subject. He was the son and grandson
of painters, but at first sought a career as an actor; he appeared
in small parts in Sir Henry Irving's company, before taking up the
study of art as assistant to James McNeill Whistler. He later went
to Paris and studied with Edgar Degas.
He became an impressionist painter, but one with
strong overtones of modernism. Just before World War I he championed
the modernists Lucien Pissarro, Jacob Epstein, Augustus John and
Wyndham Lewis. At the same time he was a leader of the Camden Town
Group of British painters. He said he preferred the kitchen to the
drawing room as a scene for paintings, but he also showed the influence
of Degas in his many paintings of music hall and theatrical scenes.
Degas also influenced him in using photographs
as the basis for paintings, and in his later career Sickert used
photographs and reworkings of Victorian paintings almost exclusively.
He is considered an eccentric but influential figure of the transition
from impressionism to modernism.
One of Sickert's closest friends and supporters
was newspaper baron Lord Beaverbrook, who accumulated the largest
single collection of Sickert paintings in the world. This collection,
with a private correspondence between Sickert and Beaverbook, is
in the Beaverbrook Art Gallery in Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Sickert's sister was Helena Swanwick, a feminist
and pacifist active in the women's suffrage movement.
The Ripper theory
In recent years, Sickert's name has been connected with Jack the
Ripper.
In 1976, Stephen Knight's Jack the Ripper: The
Final Solution (re-released in 1984), contended that Sickert had
been forced to take part as an accomplice in the Ripper murders.
Knight claimed the killings occurred because of Mary Jane Kelly's
attempt to commit blackmail after she had fallen on hard times.
She supposedly had been the nanny for Alice Margaret Crook, the
daughter in an unauthorized marriage between Prince Eddie and Annie
Crook, an acquaintance of Sickert. Sickert was claimed to have introduced
Prince Eddie to Annie Crook. Since Sickert had been in on the situation
from the start, the theory goes, he assisted Dr. William Gull and
coachman John Netley in locating and killing the women involved
in the blackmail scheme.
Jean Overton Fuller, in Sickert and the Ripper
Crimes (1990), claimed that Sickert was the actual killer instead
of just an accomplice. The opinions of Knight and Fuller are no
longer widely accepted by other Ripper scholars.
In 2002, crime novelist Patricia Cornwell, in Portrait
of a Killer: Jack the Ripper - Case Closed (2002), presented her
theory that Sickert was responsible for the serial murders in Whitechapel
in the late 19th century. She also believes he committed many other
murders. She bases her assertions on DNA comparisons, opinions about
Sickert's paintings and sketches, and the suggestion that Sickert
had a penis that was deformed from birth, which she claims would
make him incapable of sexual intercourse.
Cornwell purchased 31 paintings by Sickert and
is said to have destroyed one or more of them searching for Sickert's
DNA, which Cornwell denies. She DNA-tested numerous stamps and envelopes
she believed to have been licked by Sickert, and compared them to
stamps and envelopes from letters claiming to be written by Jack
the Ripper. Most of these contained no DNA evidence at all, which
is unsurprising considering how old they are and how they have been
treated over the years. She reports that, in one case, the mitochondrial
DNA that she assumes is from Sickert cannot be ruled out as being
a match to the mitochondrial DNA found in one of the "Jack
the Ripper" letters.
At the time of her research and book publication,
Cornwell was not aware of the collection of Sickert documents at
the Beaverbrook Art Gallery, which is likely to provide DNA on stamps.
Cornwell is continuing to finance further DNA testing in pursuit
of her hypothesis. In recent talks, she has claimed new evidence
of a connection between stationery (assumed to be the envelopes
and letters by Sickert to Lord Beaverbrook) and other Ripper-related
letters held by Scotland Yard.
Critics of her theory note that the comparisons
have only focused on mitochondrial DNA, which, depending on the
expert queried, would be shared by between 10% and .1% of the population.
Cornwell openly admits the limitations of mitochondrial DNA testing,
but defends it as the only DNA test possible at this time, given
the available DNA sources.
Critics also note that most, if not all, of the
letters are believed by most Ripper experts (including Scotland
Yard) to be hoaxes. Even if Cornwell can eventually prove that Sickert
wrote one or more of the letters claiming to be from the Ripper,
that would not be proof that he actually was the killer.
Cornwell's claim that Sickert had a deformed penis
has also been disputed. The artist was known to have several wives
and lovers, reportedly resulting in several children (including
Joseph Sickert, the man Knight got his Royal Conspiracy theory from).
This would seem to make the theory that Sickert could not perform
sexually unlikely. Further, the doctor that Sickert visited for
his fistula problem did not normally treat penises, but rather was
more of a proctologist. Fistulas also can develop on anuses, a fact
which would seem to fit the available evidence better than Cornwell's
claims that he had disfigured penis.
Most problematic for Cornwell's theory is the fact
that a number of letters from the Sickert family place the artist
as vacationing in France for a length of time that overlaps the
dates of most of the canonical Ripper murders. Cornwell and her
supporters claim that he could have traveled on a ship back to London
and then returned to France on all of these occasions, but have
shown no evidence that he did so.
The paintings are the excellent portrayal of the events and scenes
that we see around us. The painters are the best cameras of the
world. They reproduce many different types of pictures. They even
draw imaginary pictures that do not exist in this world. We tend
to use both thinned oil paints and dense oil paints. Masterpieces
can be dyed more than once, but each time it may be different from
the existing paintings.h
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|