| |
Guido Reni
The Bolognese painter Guido Reni (November 4, 1575
- August 18, 1642) epitomizes much of the best, but also some of
the more embarrassing, features of Baroque painting. He was one
of the most admired artists of his day, and his theatrical and accessible
paintings are the stock-in-trade of sentimental Roman Catholic wallet-cards
today.
Guido was born at Calvenzano near Bologna into
a family of musicians, but he was an irrepressible prodigy whom
Denis Calvaert took into his academy of design by the father's permission,
when the child was nine. Guido's talent matured swiftly. Albani
and Domenichino soon became pupils in the same academy. Guido and
Albani's intimacy turned to rivalry as they matured. Domenichino
also was pitted against Reni at the instigation of Annibale Caracci.
Guido was still studying with Calvart when he began frequenting
the rival school in Bologna run by Lodovico Caracci, whose style,
far in advance of that of the Flemish painter, he dallied with.
This exasperated Calvart, whom Guido, not yet twenty years of age,
cheerfully left, transferring himself openly to the Caracci academy,
in which he soon became prominent, being as skilful as he was ambitious.
He had not been a year with the Caracci when a
work of his excited the wonder of Agostino and the jealousy of Annibale.
Lodovico cherished him, and frequently painted him as an angel,
for the youthful Reni was extremely handsome. After a while, however,
Lodovico also felt himself nettled, and he patronized the competing
talents of Giovanni Barbiere. On one occasion Guido had made a copy
of Annibale's Descent from the Cross; Annibale was asked to retouch
it, and, finding nothing to do, exclaimed pettishly, "He knows
more than enough" ("Costui ne sa troppo"). On another
occasion. Lodovico, consulted as umpire, lowered a price which Reni
asked for an early picture. This slight determined the young man
to be a pupil no more. He left the Caracci, and started on his own
account as a competitor in the race for patronage and fame. When
he left, he had already completed a renowned work, Callisto and
Diana.
The Archangel Michael, painted for the Capucins in RomeGuido was
faithful to the eclectic principle of the Bolognese school of painting.
He had appropriated something from Calvart, much more from Lodovico
Caracci; he studied with much zest after Albrecht Dürer; he
adopted the massive, sombre and partly uncouth manner of Caravaggio.
One day Annibale Caracci made the remark that a style might be formed
reversing that of Caravaggio in such matters as the ponderous shadows
and the gross common forms; this observation germinated in Guido's
mind, and he endeavoured after some such style, aiming constantly
at suavity. Towards 1602 he went to Rome with Albani. and Rome remained
his headquarters for twenty years.
Here, in the pontificate of the Borghese Pope Paul
V, he was greatly noted and distinguished.
In the garden-house of the Rospigliosi Palace he
painted the vast fresco which is justly regarded as his masterpiece
Phoebus and the Hours preceded by Aurora. This exhibits his second
manner, in which he had deviated far indeed from the promptings
of Caravaggio. He founded now chiefly upon the antique, more especially
the Niobe group and the Venus de Medici, modified by suggestions
from Raphael, Correggio, Parmigianino and Paolo Veronese. Of this
last painter, although on the whole he did not get much from him,
Guido was a particular admirer; he used to say that he would rather
have been Veronese than any other master. The "Aurora"
is beyond doubt a work of pre-eminent beauty and attainment; it
is stamped with pleasurable dignity, and, without being effeminate,
has a more uniform aim after graceful selectness than can readily
be traced in previous painters, greatly superior though some of
them had been in impulse and personal fervour of genius.
The pontifical chapel of Montecavallo was assigned
to Reni to paint; but, being straitened in payments by the ministers,
the artist made off to Bologna. He was fetched back by Paul V with
ceremonious éclat, and lodging, living and equipage were
supplied to him. At another time he migrated from Rome to Naples,
having received a commission to paint the chapel of S. Gennaro.
The notorious cabal of three painters resident in Naples Corenzio,
Caracciolo and Ribera-offered, however, as stiff an opposition to
Guido as to some other interlopers who preceded and succeeded him.
They gave his servant a beating by the hands of two unknown bullies,
and sent by him a message to his master to depart or prepare for
death; Guido waited for no second warning, and departed. He now
returned to Rome; but he finally left that city abruptly, in the
pontificate of Urban VIII, in consequence of an offensive reprimand
administered to him by Cardinal Spinola. He had received an advance
of 400 scudi on account of an altarpiece for St Peters, but after
some lapse of years had made no beginning with the work. A broad
reminder from the cardinal put Reni on his mettle; he returned the
400 scudi, quitted Rome within a few days, and steadily resisted
all attempts at recall. He now resettled in Bologna. He had taught
as well as painted in Rome, and he left pupils behind him; but on
the whole he did not stamp any great mark upon the Roman school
of painting, apart from his own numerous works in the papal city.
In Bologna Guido lived in great splendour, and
established a celebrated school, numbering more than two hundred
scholars. He himself drew in it, even down to his latest years.
On first returning to this city, he charged about 21 for a full-length
figure (mere portraits are not here in question), half this sum
for a half-length, and 5 for a head. These prices must be regarded
as handsome, when we consider that Domenichino about the same time
received only 10, for his very large and celebrated picture, the
Last Communion of St Jerome. But Guido's reputation was still on
the increase, and in process of time he quintupled his prices. He
now left Bologna hardly at all; in one instance, however, be went
off to Ravenna, and, along with three pupils, he painted the chapel
in. the cathedral with his admired picture of the "Israelites
gathering Manna."
Penitent Magdalene: Guido turned out numerous sentimental images,
his most popular worksHis shining prosperity was not to last till
the end. Guido was dissipated, generously but indiscriminately profuse,
and an inveterate gambler. Obsessive gambling grew upon him, and
in a couple of evenings he lost the enormous sum of 14,400 scudi.
The vice told still more ruinously on his art than on his character.
It his decline he sold his time at so much per hour to certain picture
dealers; one of them would stand by, watch in hand, to oversee his
work. Haif-heartedness, half-per formance, blighted his product:
self-repetition and mere mannerism, with affectation for sentiment
and vapidity for beauty, became the art of Guido. Some of these
trade-works heads or half-figures, were turned out in three hours
or even less. It is said that, tardily wise, Reni left off gambling
for nearly two years; at last he relapsed, and his relapse was followed
not long afterwards by his death of fever. He died in debt, but
was buried with great pomp in the church of S. Domenico.
Guido was personally modest, although he valued
himself on his position in the art, and would tolerate no slight
in that relation; he was extremely upright, temperate in diet, careful
in his person and his dress. He was fond of stately houses, but
could feel also the charm of solitude. In his temper there was a
large amount of suspiciousness; and the jealousy which his abilities
and his successes excited, now from the Caracci, now from Albani,
now from the monopolizing league of Neapolitan painters, may naturally
have kept this feeling in active exercise. Of his numerous pupils,
Simone Cantarini, named "Il Pesarese," counts as the most
distinguished; he painted an admirable head of Reni, now in the
Bolognese Gallery. The portrait in the Uffizi Gallery of Florence
is from Reni's own hand. Two other good pupils were Giacomo Semenza
and Francesco Gessi.
The character of Guidos art is so well known as
hardly to call for detailed analysis, beyond what we have already
intimated. His most characteristic style exhibits a prepense ideal,
of form rather than character, with a slight mode of handling, and
silvery, somewhat cold, color. In working from the nude he aimed
at perfection of form, especially marked in the hands and feet.
But he was far from always going to choice nature for his model;
he transmuted ad libitum, and painted, it is averred, a Magdalene
of demonstrative charms from a vulgar-looking color-grinder. His
best works have beauty, great amenity, artistic feeling and high
accomplishment of manner, all alloyed with a certain core of commonplace;
in the worst pictures the commonplace swamps everything, and Guido
has flooded European galleries with trashy and empty pretentiousness,
all the more noxious in that its apparent grace of sentiment and
form misleads the unwary into approval, and the dilettante dabbler
into cheap raptures. Both in Rome and wherever else he worked he
introduced increased softness of style, which was then designated
as the modern method. His pictures are mostly Scriptural or mythological
in subject, and between two and three hundred of them are to be
found in various European collections, more than a hundred of these
containing life-sized figures. The portraits which he executed are
few — those of Sixtus V, Cardinal Spada and the so-called
Beatrice Cenci being among the most noticeable. The identity of
the last-named portrait is very doubtful; it certainly cannot have
been painted direct from Beatrice, who had been executed in Rome
before Guido ever lived there. Many etchings are attributed to him,
some from his own works, and some after other masters; they are
spirited, but rather negligent.
Of other works not already noted, the following
should be named:
in Rome (the Vatican), the "Crucifixion of
St Peter," an example of the painter's earlier manner
also in Rome, in the church of S. Lorenzo in Lucina, "Christ
Crucified"
in Forli, the "Conception"
in Bologna, the "Alms of St Roch" (early), the "Massacre
of the Innocents," and the "Pietà," or "Lament
over the Body of Christ" (in the church of the Mendicanti),
which is by many regarded as Guido's prime executive work
in the Dresden Gallery, an "Ecce Homo"
in Milan (Brera Gallery), "Saints Peter and Paul"
in Genoa (church of S. Ambrogio), the "Assumption of the Virgin"
in Berlin, "St Paul the Hermit and St Anthony in the Wilderness"
The celebrated picture of "Fortune" (in the Capitol) is
one of Reni's finest treatments of female form; as a specimen of
male form, the "Samson Drinking from the Jawbone of an Ass"
might be named beside it.
One of his last works of mark is the "Ariadne,"
once in the Capitoline Museums. The Louvre contains twenty of his
pictures, the National Gallery of London seven, and others once
there have now been removed to other public collections. The most
interesting of the seven is the small "Coronation of the Virgin,"
painted on copper, an elegantly finished work, pretty rather than
beautiful. It was probably painted before the master left Bologna
for Rome.
The paintings are the excellent portrayal of the events and scenes
that we see around us. The painters are the best cameras of the
world. They reproduce many different types of pictures. They even
draw imaginary pictures that do not exist in this world. We tend
to use both thinned oil paints and dense oil paints. Masterpieces
can be dyed more than once, but each time it may be different from
the existing paintings.h
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|