| |
Jan Mabuse
Jan Mabuse (d. October 1, 1532), the name adopted (from his birthplace,
Maubeuge) by the Flemish painter Jenni Gosart, or Jennyn van Hennegouwe
(Hainault), as he called himself when he matriculated in the gild
of St Luke, at Antwerp, in 1503.
We know nothing of his early life, but his works tell us that he
stood in his first period under the influence of artists to whom
plastic models were familiar; and this leads to the belief that
he spent his youth on the French border rather than on the banks
of the Scheldt. Without the subtlety or power of Van der Weyden,
he had this much in common with the great master of Tournai and
Brussels, that his compositions were usually framed in architectural
backgrounds.
But whilst Mabuse thus early betrays his dependence on the masters
of the French frontier, he also confesses admiration for the great
painters who first gave lustre to Antwerp; and in the large altar-pieces
of Castle Howard and Scawby he combines in a quaint and not unskilful
medley the sentiment of Memling, the bright and decided contrasts
of pigment peculiar to colored reliefs, the cornered and packed
drapery familiar to Van der Weyden, and the bold but Socratic cast
of face remarkable in the works of Quentin Matsys. At Scawby he
illustrates the legend of the count of Toulouse, who parted with
his wordly goods to assume the frock of a hermit.
At Castle Howard he represents the Adoration of the Kings, and
throws together some thirty figures on an architectural background,
varied in detail, massive in shape and fanciful in ornament. He
surprises us by pompous costume and flaring contrasts of tone. His
figures, like pieces on a chess-board, are often rigid and conventional.
The landscape which shows through the colonnades is adorned with
towers and steeples in the minute fashion of Van der Weyden. After
a residence of a few years at Antwerp, Mabuse took service with
Philip of Burgundy, bastard of Philip the Good, at that time lord
of Somerdyk and admiral of Zeeland. One of his pictures had already
become celebrated a Descent from the Cross (50 figures), on the
high altar of the monastery of St Michael of Tongerloo.
Philip of Burgundy ordered Mabuse to execute a replica for the
church of Middelburg; and the value which was then set on the picture
is apparent from the fact that DUrer came expressly to Middelburg
(1521) to see it. In 1568 the altar-piece perished by fire. In 1568
Mabuse accompanied Philip of Burgundy on his Italian mission; and
by this accident an important revolution was effected in the art
of the Netherlands. Mabuse appears to have chiefly studied in Italy
the cold and polished works of the Leonardesques. He not only brought
home a new style, but he also introduced the fashion of travelling
to Italy; and from that time till the age of Rubens and Van Dyck
it was considered proper that all Flemish painters should visit
the peninsula. The Flemings grafted Italian mannerisms on their
own stock; and the cross turned out so unfortunately that for a
century Flemish art lost all trace of originality.
In the summer of 1509 Philip returned to the Netherlands, and,
retiring to his seat of Suytburg in Zeeland, surrendered himself
to the pleasures of planning decorations for his castle and ordering
pictures of Mabuse and Jacob of Barbari. Being in constant communication
with the court of Margaret of Austria at Mechelen, he gave the artists
in his employ fair chances of promotion. Barbari was made court
painter to the regent, whilst Mabuse received less important commissions.
Records prove that Mabuse painted a portrait of Leonora of Portugal,
and other small pieces, for Charles V in 1516.
But his only signed pictures of this period are the Neptune and
Amphitrite of 1516 at Berlin, and the Madonna, with a portrait of
Jean Carondelet of 1517, at the Louvre, in both of which we clearly
discern that Vasari only spoke by hearsay of the progress made by
Mabuse in the true method of producing pictures full of nude figures
and poesies. It is difficult to find anything more coarse or misshapen
than the Amphitrite, unless we except the grotesque and ungainly
drayman who figures for Neptune. In later forms of the same subject--the
Adam and Eve at Hampton Court, or its feebler replica at Berlin--we
observe more nudity, combined with realism of the commonest type.
Happily, Mabuse was capable of higher efforts. His St Luke painting
the portrait of the Virgin in Sanct Veit at Prague, a variety of
the same subject in the Belvedere at Vienna, the Madonna of the
Baring collection in London, or the numerous repetitions of Christ
and the scoffers (Ghent and Antwerp), all prove that travel had
left many of Mabuses fundamental peculiarities unaltered. His figures
still retain the character of stone; his architecture is as rich
and varied, his tones are as strong as ever. But bright contrasts
of gaudy tints are replaced by soberer greys; and a cold haze, the
sfumalo of the Milanese, pervades the surfaces. It is but seldom
that these features fail to obtrude. When they least show, the master
displays a brilliant palette combined with smooth surface and incisive
outlines. In this form the Madonnas of Munich and Vienna (1527),
the likeness of a girl weighing gold pieces (Berlin), and the portraits
of the children of the king of Denmark at Hampton Court, are fair
specimens of his skill.
As early as 1523, when Christian II of Denmark came to Belgium,
he asked Mabuse to paint the likenesses of his dwarfs. In 1528 he
requested the artist to furnish to Jean de Hare the design for his
queen Isabellas tomb in the abbey of St Pierre near Ghent. It was
no doubt at this time that Mabuse completed the portraits of John,
Dorothy and Christine, children of Christian II, which came into
the collection of Henry VIII. No doubt, also, these portraits are
identical with those of three children at Hampton Court, which were
long known and often copied as likenesses of Prince Arthur, Prince
Henry and Princess Margaret of England. One of the copies at Wilton,
inscribed with the forged name of Hans Holbein, ye father, and the
false date of 1495, has often been cited as a proof that Mabuse
came to England in the reign of Henry VII; but the statement rests
on no foundation whatever.
At the period when these portraits were executed Mabuse lived at
Middelburg. But he dwelt at intervals elsewhere. When Philip of
Burgundy became bishop of Utrecht, and settled at Castle Duurstede,
in 1517, he was accompanied by Mabuse, who helped to decorate the
new palace of his master. At Philip's death, in 1524, Mabuse designed
and erected his tomb in the church of Wijk bij Duurstede. He finally
retired to Middelburg, where he took service with Philip's brother,
Adolph, lord of Veeren.
Van Mander's biography accuses Mabuse of habitual drunkenness;
yet it describes the splendid appearance of the artist as, dressed
in gold brocade, he accompanied Lucas of Leyden on a pleasure trip
to Ghent, Mechelen and Antwerp in 1527. The works of Mabuse are
those of a hardworking and patient artist; the number of his still
extant pictures practically demonstrates that he was not a debauchee.
The marriage of his daughter with the painter Henry van der Heyden
of Leuven proves that he had a home, and did not live habitually
in taverns, as Van Mander suggests. His death at Antwerp is recorded
in the portrait engraved by Jerome Cock.
The paintings are the excellent portrayal of the events and scenes
that we see around us. The painters are the best cameras of the
world. They reproduce many different types of pictures. They even
draw imaginary pictures that do not exist in this world. We tend
to use both thinned oil paints and dense oil paints. Masterpieces
can be dyed more than once, but each time it may be different from
the existing paintings.h
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|