| |
Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres
Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres (August 29, 1780 – January
14, 1867) was a French painter. His name is pronounced in French
(i.e. final -es is not pronounced).
Life
He was born in Montauban, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. His father was
a painter, sculptor and violinist, and taught the young Ingres in
all these disciplines. The boy's talent for music seemed most promising
at first — performance of a concerto of Giovanni Battista
Viotti was applauded at the theatre of Toulouse. In 1791 he entered
the Royal Academy of Arts in Toulouse where he studied art under
Joseph Roques, sculpture under J. Vigan, and landscape painting
under Briant.
In 1796 Ingres went to Paris to study under Jacques-Louis David,
where he studied for four years, finally wining the Grand Prix in
1801 for Ambassadors of Agamemnon in the tent of Achilles. He parted
company from David over a difference of opinion on style. Ingres's
style was more flat and linear, and focused on contour.
Napoleon on his Imperial throne, 1806In 1802 he exhibited Girl
after bathing and in 1804 a Portrait of the First Consul. These
were followed in 1806 by Napoleon on his Imperial throne and a series
of portraits of the Rivière family. These works produced
a disturbing impression on the public. It was clear that the artist
was some one who must be counted with; his talent, the purity of
his line, and his power of literal rendering were generally acknowledged;
but he was reproached with a desire to be singular and extraordinary.
"Ingres," wrote Frau v. Hastfer (Leben and Kunst in Paris,
1806) "wird nach Italien gehen, and dort wird er vielleicht
vergessen dass er zu etwas Grossem geboren ist, and wird eben darum
ein hohes Ziel erreichen." In this spirit, also, Chaussard
violently attacked his portrait of the Emperor (Pausanias Francais,
1806), nor did the portraits of the Rivière family escape.
The points on which Chaussard justly lays stress are the strange
discordances of colour such as the blue of the cushion against which
Madame Rivière leans, and the want of the relief and warmth
of life, but he omits to touch on that grasp of his subject as a
whole, shown in the portraits of both husband and wife, which already
evidences the strength and sincerity of the passionless point of
view which marks all Ingres's best productions.
Madame Rivière, 1806The very year after his arrival in
Rome (1808) Ingres produced Oedipus and the Sphinx, a work which
proved him in the full possession of his mature powers, and began
the Venus Anadyomene, completed forty years later, and exhibited
in 1855. These works were followed by some of his best portraits,
that of Monsieur Bochet, and that of Madame la Comtesse de Tournon,
mother of the prefect of the department of the Tiber. In 1811 he
finished Jupiter and Thetis, an immense canvas, Romulus's victory
over Acron, and Virgil reading the Aeneid. These were followed by
the Betrothal of Raphael, a small painting, now lost, executed for
Queen Maria Carolina of Naples; Don Pedro of Toledo Kissing the
Sword of Henry IV, exhibited at the Paris Salon of 1814, together
with the Sistine Chapel and the Grande odalisque. In 1815 Ingres
executed Raphael and the Fornarina in 1816 Aretino and the envoy
of Charles V, and Aretino and Tintoretto; in 1817 the Death of Leonardo
and Henry IV playing with his children, both of which works were
commissions from the Comte de Blacas, then ambassador of France
to the Holy See. Roger and Angelique and Francesca di Rimini, were
completed in 1819, and followed in 1820 by Christ giving the keys
to Peter.
Grande odalisque, painted 1814, Louvre. The texture of the fabric
and the smooth skin of the girl are painted in intricate detail.
The elongated features of the subject — who has apparently
too many vertebrae — are reminiscent of old Mannerist painters.
Ingres was searching for the pure form of his models.In 1815, also,
Ingres had made many projects for treating a subject from the life
of the celebrated Fernando Álvarez de Toledo, Duke of Alva,
a commission from the family, but a loathing for "cet horrible
homme" grew upon him, and finally he abandoned the task and
entered in his diary, "J'etais forcé par la necessité
de peindre un pareil tableau; Dieu a voulu qu'il reste en ebauche."
("I was forced by need to paint such a painting; God wanted
it to remain a sketch.")
During all these years Ingres's reputation in France did not increase.
The interest which his Sistine Chapel had aroused at the Salon of
1814 soon died away; not only was the public indifferent, but amongst
other artists Ingres found scant recognition. The strict classicists
looked upon him as a renegade, and strangely enough Eugène
Delacroix and other pupils of Pierre-Narcisse Guérin, the
leaders of that romantic movement for which Ingres, throughout his
long life, always expressed the deepest abhorrence, alone seem to
have been sensible of his merits. The weight of poverty, too, was
hard to bear. In 1813 Ingres had married; his marriage had been
arranged for him with a young woman who came in a business-like
way from Montauban, on the strength of the representations of her
friends in Rome. Madame Ingres acquired a faith in her husband which
enabled her to combat with courage and patience the difficulties
which beset their common existence, and which were increased by
their removal to Florence. There Bartolini, an old friend, had hoped
that Ingres might have materially bettered his position. This expectation
were disappointed. The good offices of Bartolini, and of one or
two other persons, could only alleviate the miseries of this stay
in a town where Ingres was all but deprived of the means of gaining
daily bread by the making of those small portraits for the execution
of which, in Rome, his pencil had been constantly in request.
The spring, 1856Before his departure he had, however, been commissioned
to paint for Monsieur de Pastoret the Entry of Charles V into Paris,
and de Pastoret now obtained an order for Ingres from the Administration
of Fine Arts; he was directed to treat the Vow of Louis XIII for
the cathedral of Montauban. This work, exhibited at the Salon of
1824, met with universal approbation: even those sworn to observe
the unadulterated precepts of David found only admiration for the
Vow of Louis XIII On his return Ingres was received at Montauban
with enthusiastic homage, and found himself celebrated throughout
France. In the following year (1825) he was elected to the Institute,
and his fame was further extended in 1826 by the publication of
Sudre's lithograph of the Grande Odalisque, which, having been scorned
by artists and critics alike in 1819, now became widely popular.
A second commission from the government called forth the Apotheosis
of Homer. From 1826 to 1834 the studio of Ingres was thronged, as
once had been thronged the studio of David, and he was a recognized
chef d'école. Whilst he taught with authority and wisdom,
he steadily worked; and when in 1834 he produced his great canvas
of the Martyrdom of Saint Symphorien (cathedral of Autun; lithographed
by Trichot-Garneri), it was with angry disgust and resentment that
he found his work received with the same doubt and indifference,
if not the same hostility, as had met his earlier ventures. Ingres
resolved to work no longer for the public, and gladly availed himself
of the opportunity to return to Rome, as director of the École
de France, in the room of Horace Vernet. There he executed The virgin
of the host, Stratonice, Portrait of Luigi Cherubini, and the Little
Odalisque for Monsieur Marcotte, the faithful admirer for whom,
in 1814, Ingres had painted the Sistine Chapel.
The Stratonice, executed for Louis-Philippe, duc d'Orléans,
had been exhibited at the Palais Royal for several days after its
arrival in France, and the beauty of the composition produced so
favourable an impression that, on his return to Paris in 1841, Ingres
found himself received with all the deference that he felt to be
his due. A portrait of the purchaser of Stratonice was one of the
first works executed after his return; and Ingres shortly afterwards
began the decorations of the great hall in the Chateau de Dampierre,
which, unfortunately for the reputation of the painter, were begun
with an ardour which gradually slackened, until in 1849 Ingres,
having been further discouraged by the loss of his faithful and
courageous wife, abandoned all hope of their completion, and the
contract with the duc de Luynes was finally cancelled.
A minor work, Jupiter and Antiope, marks the year 1851, but Ingres's
next considerable undertaking (1853) was the Apotheosis of Napoleon
I, painted for the ceiling of a hall in the Hotel de Ville, Paris;
Joan of Arc appeared in 1854; and in 1855 Ingres consented to rescind
the resolution, more or less strictly kept since 1834, in favour
of the International Exhibition, where a room was reserved for his
works. Napoléon Joseph Charles Paul Bonaparte, president
of the jury, proposed an exceptional recompense for their author,
and obtained from emperor Napoleon III of France Ingres's nomination
as grand officer of the Legion of Honour. With renewed confidence
Ingres now took up and completed one of his most charming productions,
The spring, a figure of which he had painted the torso in 1823,
and which seen with other works in London in 1862 there renewed
the general sentiment of admiration, and procured him, from the
imperial government, the dignity of senator.
The Turkish bath, 1862After the completion of The spring, the
principal works produced by Ingres were with one or two exceptions
(Molière and Louis XIV, 1858; The Turkish bath 1859), were
of a religious character. The virgin of the adoption, 1858 (painted
for Mademoiselle Roland-Gosselin), was followed by The virgin crowned
(painted for Madame la Baronne de Larinthie) and The virgin with
child. In 1859 these were followed by repetitions of The virgin
of the host; and in 1862 Ingres completed Christ and the doctors,
a work commissioned many years before by Queen Marie Amalie for
the chapel of Bizy.
On 17 January 1867 Ingres died in his eighty-eighth year, having
preserved his faculties to the last. He was interred in the Père
Lachaise Cemetery in Paris, France.
Work
Odalisque with a Slave, 1840It is to be noted that the Saint Symphorien
exhibited in 1834 closes the list of the works on which his reputation
will chiefly rest; for The spring, which at first sight seems to
be an exception, was painted, all but the head and the extremities,
in 1821; and from those who knew the work well in its incomplete
state we learn that the after-painting, necessary to fuse new and
old, lacked the vigour, the precision, and the something like touch
which distinguished the original execution of the torso.
Roger and Angelique, 1819, portrays an episode from Orlando Furioso
by Ludovico Ariosto.Touch was not, indeed, at any time a means of
expression on which Ingres seriously calculated; his constant employment
of local tint, in mass but faintly modelled in light by half tones,
forbade recourse to the shifting effects of colour and light on
which the Romantic school depended in indicating those fleeting
aspects of things which they rejoiced to put on canvas; their methods
would have disturbed the calculations of an art wholly based on
form and line. Except in his Sistine Chapel, and one or two slighter
pieces, Ingres kept himself free from any preoccupation as to depth
and force of colour and tone; driven, probably by the excesses of
the Romantic movement into an attitude of stricter protest. "Ce
que l'on sait," he would repeat, "il faut le savoir l'épée
à la main." ("This is what I know: one must know
the sword in the hand.") Ingres left himself therefore, in
dealing with crowded compositions, such as the Apotheosis of Homer
and the Martyrdom of Saint Symphorien, without the means of producing
the necessary unity of effect which had been employed in due measure,
as the Stanze of the Vatican bear witness, by the very master (Raphael)
whom he most deeply reverenced. Thus it came to pass that in subjects
of one or two figures Ingres showed to the greatest advantage: in
Oedipus, in the Girl after bathing, the Odalisque and The spring,
subjects only animated by the consciousness of perfect physical
well-being, we find Ingres at his best. One hesitates to put Roger
and Angelique upon this list, for though the female figure shows
the finest qualities of Ingres's work, deep study of nature in her
purest forms, perfect sincerity of intention and power of mastering
an ideal conception; yet side by side with these the effigy of Roger
on his hippogriff bears witness that from the passionless point
of view, which was Ingres's birthright, the weird creatures of the
fancy cannot be seen.
The paintings are the excellent portrayal of the events and scenes
that we see around us. The painters are the best cameras of the
world. They reproduce many different types of pictures. They even
draw imaginary pictures that do not exist in this world. We tend
to use both thinned oil paints and dense oil paints. Masterpieces
can be dyed more than once, but each time it may be different from
the existing paintings.h
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|